|
On Risk Management: Questions and Answers on Professional
Liability Insurance
By Kay G. Kenny
The Daily Record, April 9, 2001
What is lawyers professional liability insurance? What does it cover?
Do I really need it?
Whether its legal liability, malpractice or errors and omissions
insurance, professional liability coverage is designed to address negligence,
mistakes or the failure to take appropriate action and is typically
customized for the needs of specific industries law, accounting,
medicine, architecture, engineering, etc. to address exposures
that are excluded by general liability policies.
This insurance is usually mandatory for doctors, accountants, architects,
engineers, but it is optional for lawyers in Maryland. And, yes, it
is essential! Going without malpractice insurance until you have a claim
is akin to closing the barn door after the horse is out!
Here are some basic questions and answers to help your law firm clarify
its insurance needs:
How much protection?
Keeping in mind that there really are no limits to the liability of
a professional, the best starting place is to consider the nature of
your practice and the value of the matters that you handle regularly.
For example, if the firm is involved in commercial real estate and has
a number of transactions ongoing at the same time, the protection needs
may be greater than those of the personal injury firm or family law
firm which handles a volume of smaller cases.
Give some thought, too, to how the office operates, and what single
mistake might produce the biggest loss that can be imagined. For example,
if a calendar failure could make responses late on several high-value
matters, consider the resulting loss as a starting point in examining
appropriate limits.
Unlike general liability policies, most standard professional liability
policies include defense and other claim costs within the limit of liability.
Thus, when you consider ultimate loss potential, defense costs must
be included.
Most lawyers professional liability policies have aggregate limits
that will apply to all losses in a policy year. Though there may be
additional allowances for some circumstances, the total number of claims
that could arise from failures in rendering professional services should
be considered when selecting your limits.
It is statistically improbable for one mistake to cause a catastrophic
loss, or to have a series of catastrophic losses occur in one policy
year. So, a coverage limit of less than the absolute maximum is appropriate.
In the vast majority of cases, a limit that would cover 80 percent or
more of the ultimate foreseen loss or combination of losses will be
sufficient and will fit closer to the budget for professional
liability insurance.
Key policy provisions
All professional liability policies are written on a claims made
basis, not an occurrence basis. Previous columns in this
series have addressed this difference; basically, it means that coverage
is determined by the date the claim was made against you (and reported
to your insurer), not the date of the incident that triggered the claim
against you. This should be considered when reviewing other provisions.
If it is ignored, there is a distinct possibility that a gap in coverage
will result.
The most crucial provision to consider is the Prior Acts Limitation
Endorsement or Retro Date. While the policy coverage is triggered when
a claim is reported between the inception and expiration dates, policies
also provide that the event or action that led to the claim must have
occurred after this date. The insurance company often places a Prior
Acts Limitation Endorsement at the date the firm was started, unless
the firm has been insured continuously with another company. When associates
are hired this endorsement may also be added to the policy to prevent
attorneys from bringing liability exposure from their previous firm.
Another area to review is the definition of Professional Services
within the policy. This will define what activities the company considers
the practice of law, and thus how broad the coverage will be. Professional
services of lawyers, arbitrators, mediators, fiduciaries, title insurance
agents and notaries public are among those that should be included in
the standard professional liability policy.
It is also necessary to review the policy exclusions to be sure that
the activities important to your firm are covered. Though policies among
insurers differ, these are some of the more common endeavors that are
customarily excluded:
Any obligation for which you may be held liable under any workers
compensation, unemployment compensation or disability benefits law;
Any damages arising out of criminal, dishonest or fraudulent act,
error or omission;
Any liability arising out of your activities or capacity as: an officer,
director, partner, trustee or employee of a business enterprise, charitable
organization, pension, welfare, profit sharing, mutual or investment
fund or trust or any other fund, firm or organization;
Any public official, an employee of a government body, subdivision
or agency;
Any violation of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 or any State Blue Sky or securities law.
Enhancing or limiting coverage
Attorneys with office sharing arrangements, or those who are not members
of one firm, may have an endorsement that excludes coverage for vicarious
liability.
Attorneys who also are title insurance agents need to be sure that
their exposure resulting from activities for the title company are covered,
either by the definition of insured or by an endorsement
added to the policy.
Law firms that own their own title agencies may want endorsements for
title insurance agencys professional liability, rather than purchasing
separate errors & omissions policies. The insuring agreement would
be amended to include the title agency as an additional insured.
Insurance companies are especially concerned about firms that engage
in securities work. It is not unusual for an exclusion to be added to
the policy. In many instances, however, coverage for this exposure can
be added back by endorsement.
As mentioned above, defense costs typically are included within policy
limits. Concerns over this provision have been handled in a number of
different ways. Some insurers have liberalized their policies, while
others have endorsements that put costs of defense back outside limits
(claims expenses in addition to the limits of liability.)
And, particularly in this soft insurance market, another popular addition
to the policy is an endorsement for first dollar defense, an endorsement
that responds to pay defense costs from the outset, without having the
policyholder first incur a deductible.
Most of these policy enhancements are available with varying additional
premiums.
Conclusion
Although professional liability premiums have fluctuated greatly over
the past years, it is essential that your firm operate with the appropriate
coverage for their liability exposure. Assess both the financial strengths
of your company and the services it provides to help make the best decision.
Professional liability insurance: dont practice without it!
Resources
Legal Mutual Liability Insurance Society of Maryland
- Professional Liability Insurance Policy MLPL-160 (01-2000);
ALPS On the Docket - Risk Management Report: 1994 Issue - Analyzing
Your Professional Liability Insurance Protection by Robert D.
Reis, Risk Manager;
Legal Mutual Policy Endorsements MLPL-162 Prior Acts Limitation Endorsement;
MLPL-164 Lifting SEC Exclusion;
MLPL-190 Title Insurance Agencys Endorsement;
MLPL-194 (01-99) Claims Expenses in Addition to the Limits of Liability;
MLPL-196 First Dollar Defense/Aggregate Deductible Endorsement.
Kay G. Kenny is Assistant General Manager of the Legal Mutual Liability
Insurance Society of Maryland. This is the ninth in a series of articles
that includes claim prevention techniques, designed to minimize the
likelihood of being sued for legal malpractice. The material presented
does not establish, report or create the standard of care for attorneys,
is not legal advice and does not represent a complete analysis of the
topics. Readers should conduct their own appropriate research.
Back to Risk Management
|